<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media vs. Knowledge Management</title>
	<link>http://www.vocabcontrol.com/?p=101</link>
	<description>Taxonomy. And stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fran</title>
		<link>http://www.vocabcontrol.com/?p=101#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Fran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vocabcontrol.com/?p=101#comment-387</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://aboveandbeyondkm.blogspot.com/2008/10/war-between-social-media-and-km.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Above and Beyond KM&lt;/a&gt; has a good post on this too and a nice rejoinder about taking age too seriously: &lt;a href="http://aboveandbeyondkm.blogspot.com/2008/10/age-is-state-of-mind.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Age is a state of mind&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://aboveandbeyondkm.blogspot.com/2008/10/war-between-social-media-and-km.html" rel="nofollow">Above and Beyond KM</a> has a good post on this too and a nice rejoinder about taking age too seriously: <a href="http://aboveandbeyondkm.blogspot.com/2008/10/age-is-state-of-mind.html" rel="nofollow">Age is a state of mind</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fran</title>
		<link>http://www.vocabcontrol.com/?p=101#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Fran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vocabcontrol.com/?p=101#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Thanks Atul. 

I am now wondering if Records Management is part of Knowledge Management or something different. 

If Knowledge Management confines itself to that "knowledge stuff" in people's heads then a socially-based, if not social media as such, approach could do some really exciting things. I read the other day about some"social search" engines that use social networks as a way of filtering or relevance ranking results and there is something to be said for finding out what different groups of people are reading (academics, entrepreneurs, your colleagues). I spoke to Nigel the CEO of &lt;a href="http://www.trexy.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Trexy.com&lt;/a&gt; search trails the other day who said some very clever things about information being fossilised ideas and the only way to bring them to life is to add people into the equation. 

I am also very much caught up between the "everything is contextual" (e.g. Social Media-ism) notion and "we need a solid theory" approach (essentially positivism vs interpretivism). I will now go and read &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Longino" rel="nofollow"&gt;Helen Longino&lt;/a&gt; who is supposed to deal well with this (concerning epistemology) and try to write a proper post about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Atul. </p>
<p>I am now wondering if Records Management is part of Knowledge Management or something different. </p>
<p>If Knowledge Management confines itself to that &#8220;knowledge stuff&#8221; in people&#8217;s heads then a socially-based, if not social media as such, approach could do some really exciting things. I read the other day about some&#8221;social search&#8221; engines that use social networks as a way of filtering or relevance ranking results and there is something to be said for finding out what different groups of people are reading (academics, entrepreneurs, your colleagues). I spoke to Nigel the CEO of <a href="http://www.trexy.com" rel="nofollow">Trexy.com</a> search trails the other day who said some very clever things about information being fossilised ideas and the only way to bring them to life is to add people into the equation. </p>
<p>I am also very much caught up between the &#8220;everything is contextual&#8221; (e.g. Social Media-ism) notion and &#8220;we need a solid theory&#8221; approach (essentially positivism vs interpretivism). I will now go and read <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Longino" rel="nofollow">Helen Longino</a> who is supposed to deal well with this (concerning epistemology) and try to write a proper post about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enterprise 2.0 Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Social Media vs. Knowledge Management: The Reactions</title>
		<link>http://www.vocabcontrol.com/?p=101#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Enterprise 2.0 Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Social Media vs. Knowledge Management: The Reactions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vocabcontrol.com/?p=101#comment-361</guid>
		<description>[...] Vocabcontrol [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Vocabcontrol [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atul Rai</title>
		<link>http://www.vocabcontrol.com/?p=101#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Atul Rai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vocabcontrol.com/?p=101#comment-357</guid>
		<description>This is a debate which is going on in a lot of places. And, i agree with you that we need a synergy between the two approaches (maybe because i come from a particular generation ... somewhere between W and X?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a debate which is going on in a lot of places. And, i agree with you that we need a synergy between the two approaches (maybe because i come from a particular generation &#8230; somewhere between W and X?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue Massey</title>
		<link>http://www.vocabcontrol.com/?p=101#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue Massey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vocabcontrol.com/?p=101#comment-353</guid>
		<description>A friend of mine just emailed me one of your articles from a while back.  I read that one a few more.  Really enjoy your blog.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine just emailed me one of your articles from a while back.  I read that one a few more.  Really enjoy your blog.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
